adidas Terrex Agravic SLvsBrooks Cascadia 20
The adidas Terrex Agravic SL and Brooks Cascadia 20 score 92% on spec similarity. Going from the adidas Terrex Agravic SL to the Brooks Cascadia 20: 1 mm less heel stack and 27 g heavier, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Brooks Cascadia 20 minus the adidas Terrex Agravic SL. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | adidas Terrex Agravic SL | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 38 mm | −1mm |
| Forefoot stack | 33 mm | 32 mm | −1mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 279 g | 306 g | +27g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | — | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- more heel stack (39 vs 38 mm)
- a lighter shoe (279 vs 306 g)
adidas Terrex Agravic SL vs Brooks Cascadia 20: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the adidas Terrex Agravic SL or the Brooks Cascadia 20?
The adidas Terrex Agravic SL, at 279 g vs 306 g, 27 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the adidas Terrex Agravic SL or the Brooks Cascadia 20?
The adidas Terrex Agravic SL, with 39 mm of heel stack vs 38 mm, 1 mm more. Forefoot stack: 33 mm for the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20.
What's the drop difference between the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and the Brooks Cascadia 20?
None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the adidas Terrex Agravic SL and the Brooks Cascadia 20?
They score 92% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.