ASICS GT-2000 15vsOn Cloudrunner 3
The ASICS GT-2000 15 and On Cloudrunner 3 score 50% on spec similarity. Going from the ASICS GT-2000 15 to the On Cloudrunner 3: 7 mm less heel stack, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the On Cloudrunner 3 minus the ASICS GT-2000 15. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | ASICS GT-2000 15 | On Cloudrunner 3 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 31 mm | −7mm |
| Forefoot stack | 30 mm | 23 mm | −7mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 252 g | — | — |
| RRP (GBP) | — | — | — |
| Category | Daily trainer | Daily trainer | same |
| Support | Stability | Stability | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
ASICS GT-2000 15 vs On Cloudrunner 3: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which has more cushioning stack, the ASICS GT-2000 15 or the On Cloudrunner 3?
The ASICS GT-2000 15, with 38 mm of heel stack vs 31 mm, 7 mm more. Forefoot stack: 30 mm for the ASICS GT-2000 15 and 23 mm for the On Cloudrunner 3.
What's the drop difference between the ASICS GT-2000 15 and the On Cloudrunner 3?
None: both have an 8 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the ASICS GT-2000 15 and the On Cloudrunner 3?
They score 50% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our daily trainer category.