Brooks Cascadia 20vsSaucony Ride TR 3
The Brooks Cascadia 20 and Saucony Ride TR 3 score 94% on spec similarity. Going from the Brooks Cascadia 20 to the Saucony Ride TR 3: 1 mm more heel stack, 2 mm more drop and 10 g lighter.
Side by side
The Δ column is the Saucony Ride TR 3 minus the Brooks Cascadia 20. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | Brooks Cascadia 20 | Saucony Ride TR 3 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 38 mm | 39 mm | +1mm |
| Forefoot stack | 32 mm | 31 mm | −1mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 8 mm | +2mm |
| Weight | 306 g | 296 g | −10g |
| RRP (GBP) | — | £140 | — |
| Category | Trail | Trail | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Trail | Trail | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- a lower heel stack (38 vs 39 mm)
- a lower heel-to-toe drop (6 vs 8 mm)
if you want:
- more heel stack (39 vs 38 mm)
- a higher heel-to-toe drop (8 vs 6 mm)
- a lighter shoe (296 vs 306 g)
Brooks Cascadia 20 vs Saucony Ride TR 3: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Ride TR 3?
The Saucony Ride TR 3, at 296 g vs 306 g, 10 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published; reference size for both: men's (size not stated).
Which has more cushioning stack, the Brooks Cascadia 20 or the Saucony Ride TR 3?
The Saucony Ride TR 3, with 39 mm of heel stack vs 38 mm, 1 mm more. Forefoot stack: 32 mm for the Brooks Cascadia 20 and 31 mm for the Saucony Ride TR 3.
What's the drop difference between the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Ride TR 3?
2 mm. The Brooks Cascadia 20 has a 6 mm drop and the Saucony Ride TR 3 an 8 mm drop.
How similar are the Brooks Cascadia 20 and the Saucony Ride TR 3?
They score 94% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our trail category.