On CloudeclipsevsOn Cloudmonster 3
The On Cloudeclipse and On Cloudmonster 3 score 95% on spec similarity. Going from the On Cloudeclipse to the On Cloudmonster 3: 2 mm less heel stack and 10 g heavier, with the same drop.
Side by side
The Δ column is the On Cloudmonster 3 minus the On Cloudeclipse. A dash means we don't have a sourced value.
| Spec | On Cloudeclipse | On Cloudmonster 3 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heel stack | 37 mm | 35 mm | −2mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 29 mm | −2mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | ±0mm |
| Weight | 285 g | 295 g | +10g |
| RRP (GBP) | £170 | — | — |
| Category | Max cushion | Max cushion | same |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral | same |
| Surface | Road | Road | same |
| Status | Current | Current | same |
Who should pick which
Based only on the numbers above. Fit and feel aren't in this comparison.
if you want:
- more heel stack (37 vs 35 mm)
- a lighter shoe (285 vs 295 g)
On Cloudeclipse vs On Cloudmonster 3: questions
Answers are generated from the published specs on this page. Missing values are left out, never estimated.
Which is lighter, the On Cloudeclipse or the On Cloudmonster 3?
The On Cloudeclipse, at 285 g vs 295 g, 10 g lighter on published figures. Weights are as published, at each brand's reference size: men's EU 42 for the On Cloudeclipse, men's US 8.5 for the On Cloudmonster 3.
Which has more cushioning stack, the On Cloudeclipse or the On Cloudmonster 3?
The On Cloudeclipse, with 37 mm of heel stack vs 35 mm, 2 mm more. Forefoot stack: 31 mm for the On Cloudeclipse and 29 mm for the On Cloudmonster 3.
What's the drop difference between the On Cloudeclipse and the On Cloudmonster 3?
None: both have a 6 mm heel-to-toe drop.
How similar are the On Cloudeclipse and the On Cloudmonster 3?
They score 95% on Trova's spec similarity, which compares published heel stack, drop, weight, category and support. Both are in our max cushion category.